How To Be Right Book Summary By James O’Brien

*This post contains affiliate links, and we may earn an affiliate commission without it ever affecting the price you pay.

In "How to Be Right" (2018), James O'Brien looks deep into some of today's most polarizing topics.

Drawing from his experience hosting a radio show, O'Brien details conversations he has had with numerous people opposing his liberal point of view while trying to convince him of their ideas.

He carefully dissects each idea through the use of facts, challenging popular opinions and providing an alternate view.

In doing so, O'Brien equips you with the knowledge and confidence to have your own successful arguments by empowering you with correct information.

Ultimately, this book will offer insight on how to decipher what is true and what isn't when presented with complex issues from both sides.

Book Name: How to Be Right (In a World Gone Wrong)

Author(s): James O’Brien

Rating: 4/5

Reading Time: 19 Minutes

Categories: Communication Skills

Author Bio

James O’Brien, author of the book How to Be Right, is an accomplished journalist who knows the world of talk radio inside and out.

For over 14 years, he has been the host of a current affairs call-in show on London's LBC radio station.

Additionally, he has had his own daily talk show on ITV and was a presenter on BBC Two's Newsnight program.

As a contributor to different outlets such as the Daily Mirror and TLS, he's seen what it takes to get your point across in today's news climate.

With this insight and more, O' Brien offers readers invaluable advice on how to argue better in his book How To Be Right.

Uncovering The Truth Behind Today’S Most Divisive Issues Withjames O’Brien

If you’ve ever wanted to know how to challenge and dismantle misguided opinions, then you need to look no further than James O’Brien’s How To Be Right.

With 14 years of experience hosting his own radio phone-in show which has a million listeners tuning in, O’Brien knows a thing or two about taking apart flimsy arguments and showing people the bigger picture.

Take for example some of these conversations he’s had on issues like immigration, Brexit, feminism and Trump: all of them expose unchallenged opinions as second-rate arguments that quickly crumble under scrutiny.

With logic, reason and facts, O’Brien shows us how pro-Leave arguments can be wrong, why arguments against political correctness may be rooted in false rumours, and how sometimes even fighting the supposed “nanny state” may be a worthwhile cause when it opposes corporate greed.

James O’Brien is a professional talk show host who knows exactly how to take down misguided opinions – if you’re interested in understanding more about this important subject matter, then pick up a copy of his book now!

Don’T Believe The Broad Generalizations: Understanding The Varied Branches Of Islam

The media’s treatment of the faith of Islam in the press has been dangerous.

Instead of taking the time to understand and respect Islamic beliefs, many media outlets have used fear-mongering tactics to grab readers’ attention, stoking tensions even further.

This has caused some people to adopt a ‘one-size-fits-all’ generalization about all Muslims as being somehow linked with terrorist acts – an idea which is completely false and threatens human rights.

Take for example The Sun newspaper in Britain, a popular news outlet which ran commentary under the headline, “If We Want Peace… We Need Less Islam” – effectively demonizing an entire faith group without looking at nuance or context.

It hasn’t just been The Sun either – Fox News, Breitbart, The Daily Mirror and even the Daily Telegraph have all shown bias when reporting on issues relating to Islam.

This kind of irresponsible journalism can lead people to formulate views which are damaging not only to Muslim people but also corrupting our own values in regards to human rights.

The author experienced this firsthand when his father received letters accusing him of supporting Irish militants because of his last name containing an apostrophe – despite having nothing whatsoever to do with them!

This anecdote alone illustrates how quickly people can be falsely accused thanks to careless generalizations that are based off fear or prejudice rather than facts or data.

It’s important that we don’t follow these trend set by mainstream media and instead engage in dialogue and open conversation about such sensitive topics as religion so that we can make informed decisions free from bias or prejudice while keeping intact recognition and respect for all human rights.

Challenging Unscrutinized Opinions: Examining The Reasons Behind Brexit

The Brexit campaign which ultimately convinced millions of British citizens to cast their vote for Leave was founded on a number of untruths, ones that went largely unchallenged by the mainstream media.

This allowed such deceitful messages as “Britain being forced to obey unfair or somehow hurtful EU laws” and “immigration has somehow been harming the economy, driving down wages or otherwise affecting the daily lives of the average British citizen” to spread without proper scrutiny.

Caller Andy from Nottingham is just one example of a voter who took these untruths at face value, believing that leaving would give Britain independence and control over their own laws.

When asked to explain what law he believed was unfair, Andy had difficulty providing a concrete answer and eventually shifted his focus onto immigration.

And yet even then, fact-checking shows that this statement isn’t true either; there is only a small amount of wage compression in relation to labor markets, not enough to personally affect Andy’s business.

Andy was tricked into voting for Brexit without any substantial facts backing up his position; unfortunately his story wasn’t an isolated case, but rather part of a larger narrative where many were simply taken for a ride.

The Bible’S Outdated Stance On Homosexuality Exposed

When people oppose homosexuality due to their personal moral and/or religious beliefs, their argument often doesn’t stand up to closer scrutiny.

For example, it’s commonly argued that homosexuality is a lifestyle choice but this claim has only been made by male callers on the author’s show.

When pressed further on the issue, many of these callers cite religious scriptures such as the Bible or Leviticus.

But if someone wants to quote the Bible in order to make an argument against homosexuality, they need to be aware of its inconsistencies – not only did Jesus never mention anything about homosexuality in any of his teachings, but works like eating anything from the sea without “fins and scales” or wearing “garments made of two different kinds of thread” were also considered an “abomination” according to Leviticus.

Clearly, trying to use ancient texts as a source for modern morality can lead one down an unsound path.

If someone brings this up in public debate, it may be wise for them to reconsider whether their argument bears enough scrutiny for public debate.

Tabloids In Britain Feed On Misinformation To Keep People Angry And Divided

The phrase “political correctness” has long been a source of controversy, particularly when used to describe behavior or speech which is seen as catering to specific minority groups or ideologies.

Most recently however, this phrase has been politicized and used to incense people over non-issues – from so-called ‘renaming’ Christmas celebrations as ‘Winterval’ to the removal of the Union Jack flag from public buildings.

However, if you take a closer look at such claims it becomes apparent that what these sources are suggesting does not match with the facts on the ground.

Winterval for example was simply an initiative by a city planner in Birmingham who wanted to save money by having one set of decorations for multiple holidays – including Christmas – during October to December period.

Similarly, reports about the Union Jack flag being removed were false and blown out of proportion largely due to multiple outlets misusing political correctness as a means of maintaining their readership and getting people angry over non-existent issues.

It’s clear that using political correctness as a tool to incite anger over matters which ultimately don’t exist is becoming more commonplace in both mainstream media and online discussion forums.

By propagating false information using political correctness as an excuse it’s possible to try and manipulate public opinion, so it’s important that we maintain our skepticism when presented with such claims while always checking facts before pushing them onto others.

The Dangers Of Misguided Traditions: How Fear Of Feminism Is Fueling Fascism

In conversations about feminism, people have shown a desire to return to outdated norms that have been rejected by society.

Consider the UK court decision from 1984 which wouldn’t consider it rape if a married man forced his wife to have sex.

This illustrates how long it has taken for the law to recognize equality between men and women in marriage.

Or the 1975 passage of the Sex Discrimination Act that allowed women, who had previously been prevented from doing so, to apply for money loans without needing a guarantor.

What makes these views even more disturbing is that they often come with skewed logic and xenophobic thinking.

Take Jordan Peterson’s stance on this issue: he argued that certain forms of “sexual redistribution” are needed in order to prevent violence like Alek Minassian’s 2018 attack in Toronto, because if women are free to choose their sexual partners they will inevitably hurt men like Minassian who feel excluded and disrespected.

This opinion has gained traction among alt-right movements and those worrying about “men’s rights.” That is why it is important to remind them that traditional values such as sexism have never been beneficial for society, but rather a sign of growing fascism.

When presented with facts about femimism, it becomes clear that we need not worry about men no longer being able to make jokes in the workplace without being labeled a pig, but instead focus on eliminating discrimination and inequality across all areas of life.

Don’T Fall Prey To Elitism: Why We Shouldn’T Dismiss The Need For A Nanny State

Arguments against a “nanny state” often have an underlying motivation of selfishness.

These arguments come from individuals who believe that it’s unfair for them to have to pay more taxes in order to take care of people who are less fortunate than them.

They think they’re entitled to their money and don’t want their hard-earned dollars going elsewhere.

The sentiment is also often cloaked in phrases such as elitism by those who are born with more money or access to better education, which makes them feel superior and entitled when compared to those who weren’t born with the same advantages.

This sense of superiority can be seen in caller Henry’s reaction to a proposed sugar tax that would cost him extra when buying sodas and sugary fruit-flavored drinks.

He argued that paying the extra was unfair since he enjoys the occasional soda, not understanding (or perhaps not caring) that too much sugar is bad for his health and other people’s health as well.

But behind these arguments about nanny states lies a deeper question: Who really matters more? The wealthy corporations whose main concern is money over our well being? Or people like Jamie Oliver advocating for better school lunches for kids? It’s worth considering why certain individuals believe we should put our trust in large organizations rather than human experts when it comes to taking care of our health and protecting us from ourselves.

Donald Trump’S Use Of “Fake News” Has Normalized Disregard For Facts And Respect For People

Donald Trump’s political rise has revealed just how effective it can be to provide people with scapegoats and get them to shut off their brains.

Rather than providing solutions, he uses very simple slogans and catchphrases like “Lock Her Up” and “Fake News” which appeal to a sense of entitlement in white people.

This taps into the notion that these people are of a higher status and allows them to instantly dismiss any facts that contradict what they already believe.

Trump also excels in blurring the line between lies, truths and alternative realities by using phrases such as “fake news” for facts that don’t suit his interests.

For example, when he claimed to have had the largest audience ever at an inauguration despite all evidence pointing to the contrary.

The author was able to observe this approach first hand on his radio show after Trump’s planned visit to London in 2018.

A caller discussed this incident without taking into account some key things such as the fact that Trump has insulted journalists and the families of fallen US soldiers with no regard for truth or respect.

It wasn’t long before multiple cries of “Fake news!” rang out throughout the host’s studio – proving just how effective providing people with scapegoats can be in getting them to shut off their brains completely

Wrap Up

James O’Brien’s “How to Be Right” is a powerful book that packs an important message.

Throughout the book, O’Brien highlights the fact that too many people today are spreading false information via social media platforms and comment boards cloaked in anonymity.

This results in things like anti-Islam positions, panic over immigration, and political correctness going unchallenged.

But O’Brien makes it clear that these right-wing talking points don’t stand up under any kind of scrutiny, and he proves this with meaningful conversations on his talk show.

Once challenged with facts and logic, these ideas quickly fall apart – something O’Brien shows us throughout the book.

In summary, “How to Be Right” is a must-read book for those who want to know how to challenge misguided opinions in an effective but respectful way.

Arturo Miller

Hi, I am Arturo Miller, the Chief Editor of this blog. I'm a passionate reader, learner and blogger. Motivated by the desire to help others reach their fullest potential, I draw from my own experiences and insights to curate blogs.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.