Key Messages
Uncovering The Truth About English Law: Separating Fact From Fiction In Legal Reporting
If you want to gain an understanding of the reality behind fake law, then you should learn from someone who is on the inside.
By reading sections about controversial issues like child welfare, immigration and personal injury compensation, you can gain a more in-depth understanding of English law – and why certain decisions are made by judges.
This book provides a unique insight into dissecting fake law; it contains information on legal cases from recent history, allowing readers to separate fact from fiction in legal reporting.
You’ll find out why criminal sentences are often soft or harsh, why many rape victims don’t receive justice under British courts, and also get to understand what English law really says with regards to self-defense.
By delving into these topics with an insider’s knowledge, you can discover the truth behind fake news stories related to British legal proceedings and form your own opinion based on an accurate representation of the facts.
The Tony Martin Case Reveals That Homeowners Can Legally Defend Themselves—But Only Under Two Vital Criteria
Fake law tells us that homeowners defending themselves are treated like criminals, but in fact English law recognizes the right of individuals to defend their homes and families against intruders.
This means that homeowners have the right to use reasonable force, including deadly force, if needed to protect themselves.
This was demonstrated in the case of Tony Martin, a farmer who was convicted of murder after shooting an intruder in 2000.
However, while Martin may have initially believed he was acting within his legal rights to defend his property, it turned out he had not met either of the criteria for legally using lethal force according to English law; namely that the perceived threat must have been serious enough to warrant proportionate actions and that he truly believed his life was in danger at that moment.
Unfortunately for Martin, his behavior went beyond simply protecting himself and his property, even though it appears as though he thought this was what he had done.
The court concluded this showed Martin had gone too far in reliance on self-defense laws as an excuse for disproportionate or inappropriate uses of deadly force.
Therefore while fake law may tell us homeowners are criminals when they try and protect their home and family against intruders, English law is clear; providing you meet the criteria laid down by legislation then you can act lawfully within your rights of self-defense against those who break into your property.
The Charlie Gard Case Reminds Us That The Law Must Put Children’S Best Interests First
When it comes to making decisions about a child, English law insists on acting in the best interests of the child.
This is evident in the celebrated case of Charlie Gard, who was just two months old when he was diagnosed with MDDS.
Despite his parents’ wishes, a court ruled that he should stay in England and have ventilation removed from him due to his extremely poor quality of life.
This case sparked outrage both domestically and abroad, with people arguing that Charlie’s parents deserved to make the final decision about their son’s care.
However, this is not always the case.
The court looked at what was in Charlie’s best interest and determined that travelling for unproven treatment had too high a risk.
In addition, this precedents goes all the way back to the mid-twentieth century, when courts began putting protecting children’s rights above parents’ wishes when it came to conflicts over welfare.
The ultimate tragedy of this story is that even though everyone wanted what was best for Charlie, circumstances did not permit it – but unfortunately it serves as an important reminder that English law takes into account what is best for children above all else.
Understanding Uk Personal Injury Law: Is It Really About Getting Money For Nothing?
When engaging in any activity in England, either as an employer, a service provider or as a private individual, you have a legal responsibility to ensure that such activities will not cause harm to other citizens.
This concept of duty of care is essential in terms of protecting all innocent parties involved and is deeply rooted in English law.
Failing to take the necessary precautions can result in severe consequences and more often than not results in the party being held liable for any injury sustained.
In most cases, the court determines how much compensation should be awarded by taking into account the amount of pain and suffering caused by the injury itself and any immediate financial costs incurred from medical bills and days off work due to recuperation.
An additional future loss of income may also be taken into consideration if a prolonged effect on an individuals’ earning capacity is likely after an accident.
Natures Nutrition‘s Turmeric Supplement with BioPerine is designed to help you absorb as much curcumin as possible.
That’s because they contain Bioperine, which is a patented black pepper extract that has been shown to improve absorption of many herbs and spices.
In fact, it can even increase absorption by as much as 2000x better than normal turmeric capsules alone!
Does The Human Rights Act Really Champion Dangerous Foreign Criminals?
Fake Law casts doubt on the Human Rights Act, accusing it of championing dangerous criminals.
But just how accurate is that assessment?
The answer is: not very.
The Human Rights Act of 1988 and its European Convention of Human Rights form the foundation of UK human rights laws.
In addition to guaranteeing basic rights for all Europeans, such as freedom from torture or unlawful detention and protection from discrimination, it also contains a provision protecting family life–Article 8.
This safeguards the right of non-British individuals with families in the UK to remain in Britain and enjoy family life, albeit supervised in some cases.
The case of Mohammed Ibrahim is a prime example where the Act’s Article 8 has been cited as justification for keeping a non-British citizen in the country after conviction and imprisonment for a traffic accident that resulted in death.
Though it may be easy to assume that this allowed his continued and unchecked presence in Britain purely out of criminals’ rights advocacy, what’s really at play here is respect for children’s right to be with their father—a right which became codified as part of our human rights laws when we adopted the European Convention in 1988.
The Burden Of Proof Lies With The Prosecution: Understanding Why No Means No In The Courtroom
The burden of proof lies with the prosecution — which means it is their job to prove that a defendant is guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt.
This requirement puts the onus of convincing the jury squarely on the prosecution; they must provide clear and compelling evidence in order to win their case.
And while this may sound unfair, it’s an important safeguard that protects innocent people who have been wrongfully accused.
The standard of proof — beyond reasonable doubt — isn’t easy to meet, and many cases end in acquittal when the prosecution can’t provide sufficient evidence to show a person’s guilt.
But by holding the prosecution accountable for proving their case beyond a shadow of a doubt, the law ensures that even if some guilty people go unpunished, innocent people won’t be unjustly convicted based on weak or shaky evidence.
The Law Treats Everyone Equally, No Matter Who They Are
It is a fundamental belief of any functioning society that everyone should be treated equally under the law.
No matter who you are, your gender, race, religion, or political beliefs, all of us should have the same access to justice.
This concept has been entrenched in society for centuries.
Ever since the Magna Carta was introduced in the 13th century it has been forbidden to grant special legal privileges to any individual or group based on their identity.
This idea was made even stronger by The Bill of Rights, issued in 1689 which asserted that nobody is exempt from the law – not even Kings and Queens!
Today this inequality still stands despite events such as Sir Fred Goodwin’s substantial pension situation during 2008 financial crisis.
Despite him becoming public enemy number one, he was entitled to his money due to his past employment contract.
As unpopular as this may seem to some people and although it goes against popular opinion at times, everyone must be treated equally before the law.
The High Court’S Ruling On Brexit Showed How Fake Law Undermines The Rule Of Law
When the UK voted to leave the European Union in June 2016, millions of British people eagerly awaited to see a swift exit from the EU.
But after the government attempted to begin Brexit proceedings, a legal challenge arose solving an unexpected obstacle.
Three High Court judges ruled that the government would have to hold a vote in Parliament, asking if they could go ahead with the Brexit withdrawal process.
This sparked outrage throughout many British communities and tabloids labeled those judges as “Enemies of the People”, which wasn’t true at all.
All they had done is ruled that the consequences of leaving the EU would be so far-reaching as to amount to a change in UK domestic law and consequently must involve a Parliament vote.
They weren’t interfering in politics either as this matter pertained to constitutional law rather than political disputes.
Ultimately, two months later Parliament voted in favor of beginning Brexit proceedings and it was finally underway without obstruction from anyone, including the judicial system.
While this put certain minds at ease, it brought about questions about populist rage towards the British Judiciary for their ruling regarding proper procedure for Brexit.
Wrap Up
The Fake Law Book summarises the importance of upholding and respecting English law, no matter who is accused or accused.
It’s essential that due process be followed and that every person has equal protection under the law.
Centuries of progress have enabled us to create a system where democracy and human rights are defended, and public opinion doesn’t interfere or detract from this process.
In short, the Fake Law Book reminds us of our duty to protect the principles of justice, equality and fairness for all.
